Digital Notetaking: Friend or Foe?

Digital Notetaking: Friend or Foe?

Traditionally, you’d show up to a meeting toting a paper notebook in which you’d jot down comments, ideas, decisions, and action items.  Then, after most meetings, you’d return to your desk and transcribe your notes, issue e-mails re: action items, and maybe update some electronic resources (e.g. a wiki) with information from the meeting.  And if you were the poor soul tasked with preparing the minutes, you’d check your notes and wrack your brain as you try to remember everything that happened at the meeting (or at least the most important parts) so you can type up the minutes and distribute them electronically.

But with the increasing availability of digital devices in the workplace (whether provided by the employer or of the BYOD – bring your own device – variety), there’s a growing trend (or at least desire) on the part of many meeting attendees to replace paper notebooks with digital devices such as laptops and iPads.

There are many benefits to digital notetaking such as eliminating the time you’d otherwise spend transcribing your notes after the meeting.  But there are also disadvantages, with the potential for distraction often being cited as the main disadvantage.  Are individuals using digital devices really taking notes, or are they checking their e-mail or Facebook accounts instead (particularly during the less interesting parts of a meeting)?  And what about others in the room – are they distracted by the incessant clicking of keys?

For more thoughts on this question from a pro-digital notetaking perspective, check out Alexandra Samuel’s post “Dear Colleague, Put the Notebook Down“.  That post generated more than 300 comments, both in favour and against digital notetaking.  Her follow-up post, “The Unfair Stigmatization of Digital Notetaking” is also proving popular in the blogsphere.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

admissibility

Alberta Court Validates the CGSB Documentary Evidence Standards

The Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) standards for documentary evidence (Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence (CAN/CGSB 72.34-2005) and Microfilm and Electronic Images as Documentary Evidence (CAN/CGSB 72.11-93) were recently used to establish the admissibility of records in a

Read More »
electronic records

RIM and SharePoint: Some Resources

If you’re like me, you’ve probably read a lot of articles about SharePoint’s business benefits (e.g. collaboration, workflows, etc.) but rarely found articles that discuss the RIM implications of implementing this increasingly ubiquitous technology.  You’ve

Read More »
e-discovery

Managing GPS Data as a Record

Many organizations such as municipalities, utilities, construction firms, mining and resource companies, waste management contractors, and transportation and logistics companies have fleets of vehicles and large mobile workforces.  If you are an IM manager in one

Read More »
  • About the Author

  • Sheila Portrait
    Sheila Taylor
  • Sheila Taylor is a well known consultant, educator, speaker and writer with more than 25 years of experience in the information management (IM) field.

  • Recent Tweets

  • Company News

  • Search Site

  • Archives By Date

  •  Telephone

     

    (905) 702-8756
    1-877-857-7111

     

    Email

     

    info@eimc.ca

    Request A Call

    Case in Point

    That's A Lot of Records!
    Often the requirement for a needs assessment is driven by a specific initiative being considered or an immediate problem to be solved, rather than a general desire to establish a corporate (or organization-wide) IM program. We had a client wanting to improve its management of a specific group of critical records – thousands of member files in paper, microform and digital formats containing hundreds of unique document types.
    Assess, Plan and Schedule
    Ergo reviewed the organization’s current practices for managing those records, compared those practices to best practices, and identified risks and areas for improvement. From there we developed a strategic plan with a focus on records storage and retention. The plan identified the operational, financial and technological requirements for implementing the recommended changes, improvements and enhancements in the lifecycle management of the member records. Activities in the plan were classified as short term (next 6-12 months), medium term (next 12-24 months) and longer term (next 25+ months).
    Step by Step Success
    Implementation of the strategic plan enabled this organization to ensure its member records are properly identified, organized, accessible, protected and retained as long as necessary to meet operational and other requirements.
    Previous slide
    Next slide